Calculus I · Textbook draft · 20 minute reading

Computing Limits with Reasons

Apply limit laws, factoring, conjugates, squeezing, and dominant terms without discarding their assumptions.

Before you begin

  • Finite and one-sided limits; algebraic factoring; trigonometric functions in radians.

Learning objectives

  • Apply quotient and composition rules only when their hypotheses hold.
  • Resolve removable algebraic indeterminacies.
  • Use bounding arguments and distinguish growth at infinity.

Substitution is often the last line of a limit calculation, but it is not the definition of a limit. It works for polynomials because their limits obey algebraic rules; it works for a rational expression at points where the denominator has a nonzero limit. Recognizing those conditions lets us distinguish an ordinary calculation from one that needs more work.

The algebra of finite limits

Suppose lim⁡x→af(x)=L\lim_{x\to a}f(x)=L and lim⁡x→ag(x)=M\lim_{x\to a}g(x)=M, with L,ML,M finite. Then limits commute with sums, differences, constant multiples, and products. Thus lim⁡(f+g)=L+M\lim(f+g)=L+M and lim⁡(fg)=LM\lim(fg)=LM. For quotients we additionally require M≠0M\ne0, giving lim⁡(f/g)=L/M\lim(f/g)=L/M. Positive integer powers follow by repeated products.

For composition, if f(x)→Lf(x)\to L and FF is continuous at LL, then F(f(x))→F(L)F(f(x))\to F(L), provided the composition is defined nearby. Continuity will receive a careful definition shortly. Root functions are continuous on their real domains, with one-sided care at endpoints. Hence

lim⁡x→23x2−x+1x+4=116.\lim_{x\to2}\frac{3x^2-x+1}{x+4}=\frac{11}{6}.

The denominator approaches 66, not zero. That single check justifies the final division.

Zero over zero is a prompt to investigate

For (x2−9)/(x−3)(x^2-9)/(x-3) at 33, substitution gives the meaningless quotient 0/00/0. It does not give an answer of zero, infinity, or “undefined limit.” For x≠3x\ne3,

x2−9x−3=x+3,\frac{x^2-9}{x-3}=x+3,

so the limit is 66. The two expressions agree throughout a punctured neighborhood. Limits depend on exactly that nearby behavior.

Compare x/xx/x, x2/xx^2/x, and x/x2x/x^2 at zero. All display 0/00/0 on substitution, yet their behaviors are respectively a constant 11, a limit 00, and incompatible unbounded one-sided limits. The notation indeterminate form records insufficient information, not a result.

Conjugates handle some square-root cases. For x≠4x\ne4 near 44,

x−2x−4=1x+2,\frac{\sqrt{x}-2}{x-4} =\frac1{\sqrt{x}+2},

because multiplying numerator and denominator by x+2\sqrt{x}+2 exposes x−4x-4. The limit is 1/41/4. Multiplying by the conjugate is legal nearby because x+2\sqrt{x}+2 is nonzero.

Squeezing every nearby value

The squeeze theorem says that if u(x)≤f(x)≤v(x)u(x)\leq f(x)\leq v(x) for all sufficiently near allowed inputs, and both bounding functions approach LL, then f(x)f(x) also approaches LL. The inequalities must hold throughout the relevant neighborhood, not only at selected table entries.

Since ∣sin⁡(1/x)∣≤1|\sin(1/x)|\leq1, we have

−∣x∣≤xsin⁡(1/x)≤∣x∣.-|x|\leq x\sin(1/x)\leq |x|.

Both outer expressions tend to zero. This supplies a conclusion even though the middle function oscillates infinitely often near zero.

An important trigonometric limit is lim⁡x→0sin⁡x/x=1\lim_{x\to0}\sin x/x=1, with angles measured in radians. On 0<x<π/20<x<\pi/2, the unit-circle area comparison gives sin⁡x<x<tan⁡x\sin x<x<\tan x. Dividing yields cos⁡x<sin⁡x/x<1\cos x<\sin x/x<1. As x→0+x\to0^+, both bounds tend to 11; symmetry gives the left side. This argument uses elementary geometric continuity of cosine, not a derivative formula for sine. Also,

1−cos⁡xx=sin⁡xxsin⁡x1+cos⁡x⟶0.\frac{1-\cos x}{x}=\frac{\sin x}{x}\frac{\sin x}{1+\cos x}\longrightarrow0.

These results will justify trigonometric derivatives. Degrees would introduce a conversion factor; the radian convention is mathematical infrastructure, not a cosmetic preference.

Unbounded inputs and dominant terms

To study a rational expression as x→∞x\to\infty, divide numerator and denominator by a suitable highest power. For example,

5x2+2x−12x2+7=5+2/x−1/x22+7/x2⟶52.\frac{5x^2+2x-1}{2x^2+7} =\frac{5+2/x-1/x^2}{2+7/x^2}\longrightarrow\frac52.

If the denominator degree is larger, the ratio tends to zero. If the numerator degree is larger, polynomial growth remains; its sign and direction must still be checked. A memorized degree rule should summarize this calculation rather than replace it.

For radicals, x2=∣x∣\sqrt{x^2}=|x|, not always xx. Therefore x2+1/x\sqrt{x^2+1}/x tends to 11 as x→+∞x\to+\infty and −1-1 as x→−∞x\to-\infty. Forgetting the absolute value changes the second answer.

Exercises

  1. Evaluate lim⁡x→2(x2+x−6)/(x−2)\lim_{x\to2}(x^2+x-6)/(x-2).
  2. Evaluate lim⁡x→0(1+x−1)/x\lim_{x\to0}(\sqrt{1+x}-1)/x.
  3. Find lim⁡x→0sin⁡(5x)/x\lim_{x\to0}\sin(5x)/x and justify the factor 55.
  4. Use squeezing to evaluate lim⁡x→0x2cos⁡(1/x)\lim_{x\to0}x^2\cos(1/x).
  5. Find the limits of (3x3−x)/(x3+2)(3x^3-x)/(x^3+2) at positive and negative infinity.
  6. Explain why the quotient law cannot establish lim⁡x→0sin⁡x/x\lim_{x\to0}\sin x/x directly.
  7. Find lim⁡x→−∞4x2+1/x\lim_{x\to-\infty}\sqrt{4x^2+1}/x.
  8. Give an example showing that lim⁡(fg)\lim(fg) can exist even when neither factor has a finite limit.
Worked solutions
  1. Factor the numerator as (x+3)(x−2)(x+3)(x-2); the limit is 55.
  2. The conjugate gives 1/(1+x+1)1/(\sqrt{1+x}+1) near zero, with limit 1/21/2.
  3. Write 5[sin⁡(5x)/(5x)]5[\sin(5x)/(5x)]. The bracket tends to 11 in radians, giving 55.
  4. The absolute value is bounded by x2x^2, so the limit is zero.
  5. Dividing by x3x^3 gives 33 in either direction. The nonzero denominator limit justifies the quotient step.
  6. The denominator limit is zero, violating that law’s nonzero-denominator hypothesis.
  7. Write ∣x∣4+1/x2/x|x|\sqrt{4+1/x^2}/x. For negative xx, ∣x∣/x=−1|x|/x=-1, giving −2-2.
  8. Let f(x)=1/xf(x)=1/x and g(x)=xg(x)=x for x≠0x\ne0. Their product has limit 11 at zero, although the first factor has no finite limit there. To make neither factor converge, take f(x)=2+sin⁡(1/x)f(x)=2+\sin(1/x) and g(x)=1/f(x)g(x)=1/f(x); their product is identically 11 while both factors oscillate.